Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
H
Hercules
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
llvm
Hercules
Commits
e19a549c
Commit
e19a549c
authored
1 month ago
by
Russel Arbore
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
remove comment
parent
78e484d3
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
1 merge request
!182
loop bound canonicalization
Pipeline
#201703
passed
1 month ago
Stage: test
Changes
1
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
hercules_opt/src/loop_bound_canon.rs
+0
-5
0 additions, 5 deletions
hercules_opt/src/loop_bound_canon.rs
with
0 additions
and
5 deletions
hercules_opt/src/loop_bound_canon.rs
+
0
−
5
View file @
e19a549c
...
@@ -10,11 +10,6 @@ use hercules_ir::*;
...
@@ -10,11 +10,6 @@ use hercules_ir::*;
use
crate
::
*
;
use
crate
::
*
;
/*
* TODO: Forkify currently makes a bunch of small edits - this needs to be
* changed so that every loop that gets forkified corresponds to a single edit
* + sub-edits. This would allow us to run forkify on a subset of a function.
*/
pub
fn
loop_bound_canon_toplevel
(
pub
fn
loop_bound_canon_toplevel
(
editor
:
&
mut
FunctionEditor
,
editor
:
&
mut
FunctionEditor
,
fork_join_map
:
&
HashMap
<
NodeID
,
NodeID
>
,
fork_join_map
:
&
HashMap
<
NodeID
,
NodeID
>
,
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment