* Problem sentences
  1. I gave the dog food. I gave the dog much food.

     The second sentence is not analyzed at all. If the two sentences
     are given to the SRL independently, the arguments are correctly
     identified.

  2. I gave the dog food. I gave the dog a lot of food.

     The second gave is identified as an AM-MOD. When the second
     sentence is given alone, this doesn't happen.

  3. "I gave the dog food. " vs. "I gave the dog a lot of food."

     The first sentence is analyzed incorrectly. Can this be fixed
     using proper subcategorization or maybe with the correct sense of
     the predicate?


  


* Nom SRL predicates
  
  We need a better way to pick NOM SRL predicates. Try the following
  sentences:

  1. His thought was that the building is falling.

     /thought/ is missed because the POS tagger does not identify it
     as a noun.